AgileTrack

3.4 (1)

Vendor

Vendor	AgileTrack Software, LLC
Homepage	http://www.agiletrack.net
Adress	2777 West 370 North 84601 Provo, UT
Country	United States

Software

Category	Desktop Scheduling
Architecture	Client-Server (DB)
Client OS	•
Language	English
Licence	Commercial
Domain	Agile (Software Development)

Description

As its name suggests, AgileTrack supports the planning and management of Agile software development projects. Unlike some of its competitors, AgileTrack is not web-based but rather a rich client application. The software is available in MS Windows- and Linux-based versions and stores its data in a locally or centrally installed database. This tool enables the management, planning, and control of any task (work packages, bugs), releases, and iterations. Data are not presented in the form of product backlogs and sprint backlogs but as a list, which can be reduced through use of appropriate filtering. Prices start at $39 per user.

Highlights	Agile methodology
	Time logging
	Task and Issue management

User reviews

Average user rating from: 1 user(s)

To write a review please register or log in.

Overall rating:		3.4
Time Management:		3.0 (1)
Resource Management:		3.0 (1)
Controlling:		3.0 (1)
Usability:		4.0 (1)
Price/Performance ratio :		4.0 (1)

Limited-feature agile tool

Overall rating:

3.4

Was this review helpful to you?

Reviewed by Rugo
May 31, 2010
Top 10 Reviewer

Comments (0)
View all my reviews
Report this review

0 of 0 people found the following review helpful

Review Criterias

Pros	Works both on Windows and Linux, provides web services interface, defect management, a very useful search functionality with quick query building function, drag-drop function for files, easy and attractive interface with well organized functions. Good documentation is available.
Cons	Very basic tool and lacks serious features. Reporting, collaboration and many other advanced features are lacking. Cannot use it for large projects
Conclusion	It is very basic and doesn't have advanced features…so you would probably use it only for small projects that have small team sizes. But then you would have other options for small projects…and you might want to explore those too. The interface, however, had been done very nicely and it makes the learning curve very short...of course, the lack of features also brings down the learning curve :)